Skip to main content

Posts

Policy on quiz re-takes

My policy on quiz re-takes : Because my moodle quizzes select from a random pool of questions, and shuffle those questions, and shuffle the possible answers, every student’s quiz is slightly different.   Typically half the questions are new -- i.e. taken from the NewQuestions pool.  Therefore, the assessment is more likely to demonstrate students’ actual knowledge of the topic rather than their ability to memorize prior sequences or even rote answers. The structured nature of a test, along with its numeric reward system,  motivates students to prepare (study) in the first place, and then the focus required to answer the questions helps to cement those answers in memory.   Thus, repeated test sessions can actually encourage learning, as opposed to simply serving as a measurement tool -- if that were the case, we should administer a single test just prior to the reportcard. Currently for every quiz, I offer a second re-take, with the average result tr...

Online quiz question-building tips, and considerations about relative importance

Building a pool of questions for online quizzes (we use Moodle now, but this ought to apply to most such Course Management Systems) requires some considerations that may not be obvious at first. It also raises questions about relative importance of quizzes at different times in the semester. Quiz question tips:  in order to make best use of moodle’s random-pool and random-shuffle mechanism, each question must be written to stand on its own.   Further, the answers will be shuffled as well, so they may occur in any sequence  (do not use phrases like “None of the above”). Do not assume any time-based or contextual reference points, as this question could crop up 3 months later, all on its own.   Make sure to include fully any book title references.  Use standard tag-prefixes in the question title (note that the question title is not seen by the student) as tips for the teacher: for example,   “Grammar”  or “TKAM”.   If a q...

Notes on attending a seminar by Ken O'Connor

Attended a seminar by Ken O'Connor earlier today.   I was kindly invited by Chadwick International School in Incheon to see this published and very opinionated expert on grading and report cards. He was primarily discussing his latest book How to Grade for Learning by Using 15 Fixes for Broken Grades .   Noted that grades and marks are used interchangeably, but should have distinct meanings:  Marks (or scores) are on individual assessments, whereas Grades are summary symbols on report cards. Reminding us of the Understanding By Design guidelines:  are grades Accurate Consistent Meaningful Supporting of Learning ? In his opinion, grades should be simply the way to communicate achievement status to parents, students, other schools. It confuses the issue when we try to also incorporate these others uses of grades:  self-evaluation, selecting students for later coursework, incentives to learn, effectiveness of teaching. O'Connor is rather st...

Adjusting Classroom to improve projector and whiteboard use for learning

At YISS we have data projectors in each classroom, but no Interactive WhiteBoards. An idea to make our classrooms more amenable to data-projector use; to gain one of the benefits of a SmartBoard:   Currently most classrooms have 2 large WhiteBoards attached to, and centered on, one wall of the classroom.  They also have an electric-rolldown projection screen centered on that wall, with a projector aimed at the screen.  Thus, when the screen is not rolled down, the image projects onto the WhiteBoards, with the metal border of each board precisely down the center of the image!   The projector lens is focused on the roll-down screen; but the additional distance to the WhiteBoard is not so great as to make the image fuzzy when projected directly onto the Board.  However, the vertical metal frame down the middle makes the image almost useless when projected directly onto the Boards. Solution, given existing purchasing stock of WhiteBoards:  shift the Boards at...

Notes on use of SafeExamBrowser

Notes on the feasibility of using SafeExamBrowser for final exams, after some practical experience 30May morning with English9 final exams. Summary:  Planning for final exams online, from MPR: 1- Best to stagger logins, so that the servers are not overwhelmed by a surge of requests; 2- SafeExamBrowser is markedly less functional with editable textboxes (i.e. not good with lots of essay questions) 3- SafeExamBrowser is probably most appropriate when we need a few students to take an online quiz without our close monitoring.    4- Need to remind SafeExamBrowser users -- maybe add some text on the YISS splash page like this: The SafeExamBrowser is designed with some features different from a regular browser.  Certain features are disabled:  switching to another window, copypaste and selection keys.  Because of extra security, the response time may be a bit slower than usual, so be patient.  Note the “busy traffic” blinking icon shows in the...

Death knell for Interactive WhiteBoards?

A thoughtful writer comes up with explanations for Interactive WhiteBoards' tepid success in helping students, and great success in selling product to administrators.  Lesson: now sell your stock in Promethean. Check out this article on Edsurge , by J.Orbaugh. As much as I have loved using Interactive WhiteBoards in the classroom, their cost seems quite disproportionate to the benefit in most classrooms.   In most cases, a simpler technology that allows the computer to track gross pointer movement onscreen would be sufficient.   The extra software control requires so much investment in training -- and adjusting lesson plans -- that few teachers use it, and few administrators allocate the training time and administrative attention to get it used. Again we return to my basic assumption: administrator attention is where things happen.