Skip to main content

Elizabeth Warren uses cold-calling in the classroom, too!

​An important technique of my classrooms has been cold-calling, using random selection of students. 
Here's a progressive politics rationale for that!
https://chroniclevitae.com/news/2244-what-elizabeth-warren-can-teach-us-about-teaching

Actually, they don't fully describe her classroom process, as it sounds like she's only  random with a subset.  But the general idea is there!
At least she's not simply calling on those with their hands raised--that's patently unfair, in my book.

What methods have I used? 
The best I've found, for K-12 students anyway, is the popsicle stick method, with a can that contains one stick with each student's name on it.  I publicly display the can, ask a question, then publicly select a stick.  Everyone pays attention.  Nobody's left out.  (I admit to occasionally cheating, in unusual cases, to avoid calling on someone.  But even then, I go through the motions so that the process seems fair.)  

I have also built an excel spreadsheet that selects a random name from a given list; or builds a randomly-sorted list of names.   The latter works well for assigning, say, parts in a play, or group work.  But the computer seems too artificial and slow to use during a (necessarily) fast-paced classroom discussion. 

I have also used an iPhone app that displays a random name from among a given list -- again, that's artificial and not as patently obvious as the sticks.  Unless it's actually mirroring an onscreen display, the answer is not patently obvious to the students.

I have also, when lacking any of the above tools, simply tried my own obviously-human random selection, sometimes by patently waving my hand above a list and pointing at a name.  This reassures us all that my point is to randomly select someone -- students like the "fairness" of that.  Or at least they cannot complain, because it is more "fair" than the traditional teacher method of calling on hand-raisers or purposely calling on perceived slackers.  

The randomness is important from both the student and the teacher point of view -- it keeps us both on our toes.  I need to be sure that my question is reasonably answerable, given what I have covered in class.  Again, I confess that in a weak moment I have called on The Student Who Is Sure To Have The Answer That I Want;  or the student who is dozing.  But in general I try to follow random selection for cold-calling.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review: The Road Less Traveled: The Secret Battle to End the Great War, 1916-1917

The Road Less Traveled: The Secret Battle to End the Great War, 1916-1917 by Philip D. Zelikow My rating: 5 of 5 stars View all my reviews

Kite Runner is with us again

 Six or so years ago, I taught The Kite Runner to three successive sets of tenth-graders, and marveled at the effect the novel had on me and on these adolescents.  That age is a marvelous time for a humanities teacher, as we see callous children grow out of their self-centered cocoons and flex their world-empathic feelers.  They grow into the world outside them and realize they truly have agency -- or will have agency and responsibility for human actions.  Amir, the main protagonist of Kite Runner is so identifiable with those adolescents learning to take responsibility for their callous actions.   And of course we think of Kite Runner now that Afghanistan once again plunges into Taliban rule -- we particularly worry about the fate of the Hazara (news stories already cite random executions of Hazara men).   We can only wring hands and pray that the Taliban will have to adapt and tolerate more than they did before -- but I am not optimistic. ...

Review: The Empathy Diaries: A Memoir

The Empathy Diaries: A Memoir by Sherry Turkle My rating: 5 of 5 stars I cannot stop talking about this book, and not just because the author is a favorite of mine, with her earlier books about the effect of technology on education and our psyches. She describes encounters with so many other famous writers and technologists -- she was Present at the Creation of our computer-saturated internet world. Note that the title is purposely plural: several personal points are interwoven into the chapters, sometimes repeating details that a "normal" book would elide. But she is a talented writer and psychologist: the very writing style is intended to affect the reader and illustrate psychological points. I did cringe at the repeated references to the Freudian incident with her stepfather (fear not, dear reader -- no outright abuse here, just psychological trauma unearthed by years of analysis, along with all-too-typical infidelity and familial...