Skip to main content

Analyzing our approach to assignment deadlines

The faculty attitude to assignment deadlines:  Let's discuss this at faculty meeting!
We make homework assignments in order to
    ⁃    extend learning a topic already covered
    ⁃    reinforce learning a topic currently discussed
    ⁃    prepare for a specific performance task as a group (discussion, recitation, lab, etc)
    ⁃    provide differentiation, so all students can learn more material (if some cannot finish within classtime limits, then finish at home)
    ⁃    cover basic principles in advance (flipped classroom), so that classtime can be spent on questions and coaching
    ⁃    accomplish a capstone project that represents culmination of the course learning goals
We set deadlines for assignments in order to:
    •    emulate adult life, prepare them for adult life with its deadlines;
    •    instill order and discipline;
    •    reinforce the sense of structure in our learning;
    •    scaffold the sequence, as the next more advanced topic is coming “today”
    •    allow students to assist each other on group assignments or just in cooperative study groups
    •    allow time for the teacher feedback to be formative, to improve understanding of the next topic
    •    grade the assignments all at once, which is desirable because it improves:
    ⁃    teacher efficiency because of setup/organizing effort
    ⁃    reliability of grading, as all are using the same rubric (later might lose the rubric or adjust it over time)
    ⁃    accuracy, when performance/observation elements are included (memory degrades over time)
    ⁃    consistency of grading, as most rubrics require subtle interpretations that can vary over time
    ⁃    planning for future lessons, given a broad view of current student understanding
    ⁃    effectiveness of feedback if it is given quickly and reliably

Why would homework be worthless if received after the deadline?
    ▪    Teacher has no time to assess it
    ▪    Teacher has no inclination to assess late work
    ▪    The original assignment involved discovery that is now moot
    ▪    Original assignment was time-based, assessing time-bound performance ability
    ▪    The homework is actually preparation for a lab
    ▪    Materials are no longer available
    ▪    Student can copy or mimic other students’ known quality work, can craft work specifically
    ▪    The deadline is end of quarter, beyond the grading period!

Why should teacher impose a penalty for late work?
Because of historical precedent — that is what teachers experienced, and what students expect
Because it is seen as reasonable and fair
To impose a cost, thereby discouraging students from repeating the lateness
In advance, to encourage students to complete assignments on time
Recognizing our innate sense of justice, to reward students who completed the work on time and punish those who delayed
Penalty is an economic disciplinary act
A numeric value is easier than behavioral conditioning
A numeric value is less personal — thus more objective — than hectoring or pillorying
To impose a cost, as the teacher must spend time re-collecting the rubric and restarting the assessment process (this varies, of course—simple answers are easy to grade, while essay rubrics are costly to restart).  The penalty reflects the institution’s/teacher’s difficulty at restarting the assessment, re-opening the gradebook.
Emulate a later life condition:  late-fee penalties, missed-deadline prices, lost discounts.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Jerusalem, Jerusalem: How the Ancient City Ignited Our Modern World

Jerusalem, Jerusalem: How the Ancient City Ignited Our Modern World by James Carroll My rating: 4 of 5 stars Fascinating comprehensive worldview, with Jesuitical logic in a broad sweep that links religion in a circular way to violence and the solution to violence. The author shows a great command of history and religion, with extensive endnotes to support or expand upon most of his claims; however, some sweeping indictments will certainly be resisted by the more fundamentalist People Of The Book (that is, the Abrahamic religions). A core symbolic thread is Abraham's near-sacrifice of Isaac on Mt.Moriah, the supposed site later called Jerusalem -- the author deftly cites that scene throughout the many centuries since the original event, demonstrating the human tendency to misinterpret that near-sacrifice in order to rationalize our own tendency to violence and scapegoating. I started the book in audio form, but found it unlistenable -- the author's c...

Kite Runner is with us again

 Six or so years ago, I taught The Kite Runner to three successive sets of tenth-graders, and marveled at the effect the novel had on me and on these adolescents.  That age is a marvelous time for a humanities teacher, as we see callous children grow out of their self-centered cocoons and flex their world-empathic feelers.  They grow into the world outside them and realize they truly have agency -- or will have agency and responsibility for human actions.  Amir, the main protagonist of Kite Runner is so identifiable with those adolescents learning to take responsibility for their callous actions.   And of course we think of Kite Runner now that Afghanistan once again plunges into Taliban rule -- we particularly worry about the fate of the Hazara (news stories already cite random executions of Hazara men).   We can only wring hands and pray that the Taliban will have to adapt and tolerate more than they did before -- but I am not optimistic. ...

Related Reviews: This Is How They Tell Me the World Ends: The Cyberweapons Arms Race then Attack Surface

This Is How They Tell Me the World Ends: The Cyberweapons Arms Race by Nicole Perlroth My rating: 5 of 5 stars And the hits just keep on coming! This excellent book details an unrelenting onslaught of cyberattacks, and outlines the author's own gradual realization of the dangers of internet warfare. It is a lengthy but worthwhile read -- actually, I lost the book for a while because I did not want to read it at bedtime, for fear of nightmares or disrupted sleep! Indeed the book is changing my stance toward online security -- multi-factor authentication, definitely! As with most of us, the author first downplayed the fear tactics promoted by sellers of security packages; but after years of research she has come to wonder that more disaster has not happened yet. She briefly but baldly calls out the recent presidentical administration for wreaking havoc on US defense, by eliminating a cybersecurity department, incensing the Iranian and Chinese gover...